Lecture 2 — Degrees of Freedom, Newton’s Equations, and Phase Space#
Source: NPTEL Classical Physics, Mod-01 Lec-02, Prof. V. Balakrishnan.
Counting degrees of freedom#
A single particle moving in three-dimensional space needs three independent coordinates to fix its position, so it has 3 degrees of freedom. \(N\) unconstrained particles therefore have \(3N\) degrees of freedom in total. These coordinates need not be Cartesian — they can be angular, or a mix — so we call them generalized coordinates and write them \(q_1, \dots, q_{3N}\), reserving the symbol \(q\) precisely because it carries no commitment to a particular coordinate system.
A constraint removes degrees of freedom only if it is an equality relating coordinates (a holonomic constraint) — for instance fixing the distance between two particles, \(r_{12} = \text{const}\). An inequality, such as confining a particle to one quadrant of a plane, does not reduce the count at all: it is a non-holonomic constraint, and the particle still has as many degrees of freedom as before, just a restricted range for them.
This distinction matters because it is tempting, but wrong, to guess the naive formula for a rigid body by simply subtracting one constraint per pairwise distance held fixed. For \(N\) points with every pairwise distance \(r_{ij}\) fixed, there are \(3N\) coordinates and \(\binom{N}{2} = N(N-1)/2\) such constraints, so the naive count is
which turns negative once \(N \gtrsim 6\) — an impossibility. The resolution is that most of these constraints are redundant: once a handful of them hold the body rigid, the rest follow automatically. Counting the true number of independent degrees of freedom two different, independent ways settles it:
Way 1. Three coordinates fix the center of mass \(\vec R\). The orientation of a body-fixed frame relative to a space-fixed frame then takes exactly three Euler angles. Total: \(3 + 3 = 6\).
Way 2. Three coordinates fix the center of mass. The rotation axis is a unit vector on a sphere, needing two angles (latitude/longitude), and the rotation angle about that axis is a third. Total: \(3 + 2 + 1 = 6\).
Both routes agree: a rigid body has exactly 6 independent degrees of freedom, no matter how many particles it is built from — 3 translational and 3 orientational. This is also why a rigid diatomic molecule has 2 rotational degrees of freedom (there is no moment of inertia about the bond axis) rather than 3.
Newton’s equations need velocities too#
Drop a piece of chalk from rest and it falls straight down; give it a little sideways push and it traces a parabolic (really, elliptical) arc; push harder and it goes into orbit; harder still and it escapes on a hyperbolic trajectory. The initial position and the force law alone did not fix which of these happens — the initial velocity did. Newton’s equation,
is second order in time, so the state that must be specified to get a unique future is the pair \((q, \dot q)\), not \(q\) alone. A system with an explicitly time-dependent force is called non-autonomous; without that explicit \(t\)-dependence, it is autonomous — and it is autonomous systems that occupy most of this course.
Because \(q\) and \(\dot q\) are independent initial data, the natural arena for dynamics is not configuration space \(\{q\}\) but phase space \(\{q, \dot q\}\): the space of positions and velocities together.
Phase trajectories cannot cross themselves#
This single geometric fact carries a lot of weight. If a phase trajectory of an autonomous system crossed itself (or crossed another trajectory), the crossing point would be a single initial condition from which the future would have two different continuations — which contradicts the determinism of Newton’s equations. Hence:
For an autonomous system, no phase trajectory can intersect itself, and no two distinct phase trajectories can intersect each other. The one loophole is a trajectory that closes on itself — which is exactly periodic motion.
Worked example: the harmonic oscillator#
For a conservative force \(F(q) = -dV/dq\), energy conservation collapses the two first-order equations \(\dot q = v,\ \dot v = -V'(q)/m\) down to a single algebraic curve in phase space:
For the harmonic oscillator, \(V(q) = \tfrac12 m\omega^2 q^2\), so
an ellipse for every \(E > 0\), traversed clockwise (start at maximum \(q\) with \(v=0\); releasing from rest sends it back toward the origin, i.e. \(v\) goes negative first). Larger \(E\) gives a larger concentric ellipse, so — in Balakrishnan’s phrase — the phase plane is laminated by these ellipses, with the one exceptional trajectory being the single point at the origin (\(E=0\)), the equilibrium. The figure below is exactly this picture, animated: the background shows the lamination, and the marker traces one representative trajectory in real time.
Drag the slider (or hit Play): the point moves clockwise at constant angular rate \(\omega\) regardless of which ellipse it is on — the hallmark of the harmonic oscillator being isochronous (period independent of amplitude, i.e. of energy). Every other trajectory in the lamination is a scaled copy of this one; none of them intersect, exactly as the non-crossing theorem requires.
Worked example: the inverted oscillator#
Now flip the sign of the potential, \(V(q) = -\tfrac12 m\omega^2 q^2\) — a hilltop at the origin rather than a well. This is precisely the “complete the phase portrait” exercise the lecture leaves open, for the three cases \(E<0\), \(E=0\), \(E>0\):
\(E > 0\): \(v\) never reaches zero — the particle has enough energy to cross the hilltop, so the trajectory runs monotonically from \(q=-\infty\) to \(q=+\infty\) (or back). These are hyperbola branches opening up/down.
\(E = 0\): \(v = \pm\omega q\) — straight lines through the origin, the separatrices, approached only asymptotically as \(t\to\pm\infty\).
\(E < 0\): the particle cannot reach the hilltop; \(|q|\) is bounded below by \(\sqrt{2|E|/m}/\omega\), and the particle rolls up, turns around at \(v=0\), and rolls back. These are hyperbola branches opening left/right, confined to one side or the other — the region between the two turning points is dynamically forbidden (it would require negative kinetic energy).
The highlighted, animated branch has \(E=1>0\): the marker sails straight across the hilltop without pausing, gaining speed as it passes \(q=0\) — the mirror image of the harmonic oscillator’s closed, periodic ellipses. Compare it against the \(E<0\) branches in the background, which turn around before ever reaching \(q=0\), and against the dashed \(E=0\) separatrices they asymptote to. Unlike the harmonic oscillator, there is no periodic motion anywhere in this portrait except the unstable equilibrium point at the origin itself.